This past week, Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross showed why many owners choose to let National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell do their talking for them. Ross spoke out for the logic of extending the current 16 game season to 18 games, saying, "The additional games, the studies show will not really increase injuries. We're still playing 20 games, we're eliminating two preseason games and adding two regular-season games, which is really what helps with the revenues, and make the fans a lot happier and those games will be a lot more meaningful. But in terms of the players, they're still playing 20 games."
The idiocy of this argument is dizzying. Of course more games will mean more injuries. Of course even someone who wouldn’t know Tom Brady from Tommy Tune could surmise the differences in intensity between preseason and an actual football game. It’s like comparing a tofurky to the real deal. These comments were especially galling coming from Ross, whose Dolphins are injury depleted to the point where their starting quarterback is third stringer Tyler Thigpen.
NFL Players Association President DeMaurice Smith wasted no time striking back at Ross. "Comments like that tell me that they just don't get it,” he said. “Their teammates lost two franchise quarterbacks in the same game ... and the message is we shouldn't worry about adding two more games? Men are not expendable and neither are their families." This question about whether to extend the season by two extra games has become one of the great sticking points in the ongoing negotiations aimed at avoiding a 2010 lockout in the country’s most popular sport.
I asked Smith two weeks ago about the owners’ push for an 18 game season and whether it was a deal-breaker in the current negotiations. He said, "Our only strong stance is about signing a new collective bargaining agreement. That's it. I'm willing to discuss anything that guarantees that football continues for our players. There's an 18 game proposal from the NFL that we have looked at - we're going to respond to it - but there are some things that are inviolate. When I show up at a team meeting and I've got half the guys sitting in a conference room wrapped up in ice, three or four guys already on crutches, well anybody who wants to know how brutal this game is, show up at a team meeting on a Monday morning after a Sunday game where you watch some of the best athletes in the world tip-toe down two steps, where if you want to shake hands, you had better be gentle. So it's not an enhanced season, as the owner's call it. It's two more end of the season games where players are already beat up, nicked up, and knocked out."
It’s this heightened awareness of injuries and the owners desire to throw on two new games without increased compensation that has the two sides in a Buffalo Stance. I asked Smith in May, on a scale of 1-10, what the chances were for a lockout to start the 2011 season. He put it at a 14. When I asked Smith again, he said, "Still at 14... We are still far away from a deal being signed by the deadline in March. Just [five] weeks ago the NFL informed us that they were going to cancel the NFL players and their family's health insurance in March if a lock-out occurs if you're sitting where I'm sitting and you want to know if a lock-out is on the table, I'm not sure that any player in the National Football League would disagree with me that there's a strong likelihood that this is going to happen."
The scheduled canceling of health care benefits for players and their families has been received by the players as a heartless, aggressive act, especially with the recent avalanche of press stories about the physical toll of playing the game. "Our players risk everything on the field," he said. "There's been a lot of media coverage of the helmet to helmet hits, over the last few weeks, and the cover of Sports Illustrated is about concussions...There has been recently a great deal of concern expressed by ownership about it. The thing that we wanted to point out to our fans is that the NFL, right now as we speak, has sued 262 players over their workers comp. It still takes at least a three year NFL career to get any health care after you retire. We had to fight legislation from a team last year to take away workers comp from the players who play the game, being notified in March that their health insurance will be canceled. The players, and likely their families, are saying 'How can you express a concern about health and safety, after watching four hits on Sunday, and then snap your fingers and say that health care is over in March?' It seems both hypocritical and misleading... They put out a press release about larger fines, larger punishments, perhaps suspensions, but oh by the way, ignore the fact that we're going to cancel the health insurance for people who have kids, at least two players whose kids are in need of heart transplants. We have several who have kids on kidney dialysis. Right now we as a union are trying to figure out how to provide supplemental health insurance for the players families.”
Most strikingly, at the end of our discussion, Smith made an open plea to involve fans in struggle to avoid a lockout and made clear that this issue transcends sports. "Fans [who want to help] can go to NFLOCKOUT.com. We will send people to speak at any union meetings or community meetings.... Only the owners make money when there is a lockout, making four billion dollars from the networks and paying nothing in salaries. But everybody else loses. Every city would lose about a hundred and fifty million a year in revenue. Every city will lose jobs. It's bigger than professional football. We all have an interest to avoid a lockout."
[Dave Zirin is the author of “Bad Sports: How Owners are Ruining the Games we Love” (Scribner) Receive his column every week by emailing dave@edgeofsports.com. Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com.]
While I feel for the players in the NFL and wish them well in their struggle to be treated as human beings, and not disposable commoditties, they have a strong union, good salaries, and employer provided health care. So many americans are struggling with similar issues right now without any support at all. Struggling to find ways to provide for their famalies in the face of lay offs, falling incomes, loss of healthcare and a collapsing social saftey network. What we need is a workers solidarity movement that trancends profesion to include all workers. I would like to see NFL players lending their voices and high profile positions to strugliung Wal-mart workers, or laid off steel/auto workers in the rust belt, or the fight against sending manufacturing jobs over seas to be done by slave labor to increase corporate profits. These are the people who suppoort them every sunday and put up there hard earned money. If players want help in their fight against managment abuses, lets see them step up for us when it counts.
To hell with all the millionaire players and their billionaire owners!!! Let all professional teams lock out so sports fans can get a much needed reality check and keep their hard earned money in their pockets!!! The only way to make any substantial change is by not allowing any franchise, team, player and/or owner use the rest of us as unlimited piggy banks!
I am thankful to live in a nation that has lifted more people out of poverty than any other.
I am also thankful that Marxism has been so discredited that it is limited to North Korea, Cuba and leftist blogs that have mutated into selk-parodying identity politics. Viva Reagan!
A great way for players to protest the games is to play "light" for those two games and ensure a tie game at the end. It would still screw fans who should not be paying so much for tickets in the first place. Though, in the greater scheme of things, it would be a good statement of solidarity and would also bring more attention to the NFLPA's plight. If 10 of 16 games in one week end in a tie, how could ESPN and other media outlets not take a greater interest in the issue? Seeing players protest on the field during televised games is more effective than having empty fields with no cameras.
It's too bad that there is such a disconnect between the players and the fans. The US-sport leagues are just not wired for good dialogue between the players' and fans' interest. I know that there is twitter and that is a great improvement, but, just as it is with all workers, there is no effective means for players to have substantial discussions with fans about their mutual interests and their perspectives. Much like the low/middle classes who remain obedient in hopes of breaking through the glass ceiling or at least staying afloat, most players stay out of these topics in hopes of greater contracts or just staying in the league. It's too bad that there is little dialogue between any labor interests - high profile or not - because there is so much to discuss.
With respect to HS's post about players having substantial discussions with their fans, I'm afraid this would be a one-way conversation. I don't see a vast majority of professional athletes wanting to have dialogues with their fans to discuss the labor situation in the US. If the average fan wanted to talk to an athlete, he/she would have to navigate through PR flacks or agents before being denied.
In the meantime we always have the paparazzi as a back-up.
I have a great deal of respect for NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith. He is not the one who is pushing hard for a work stoppage. I am fine if the players are steadfast in their desires and demands. I am not someone who is against a work stoppage. When you have so much money at stake, there needs to be as much time taken as possible to iron out any differences. I like to consider myself a fairly evolved sports fan. It is 2010. I definitely see more work stoppages in the future with other leagues. I don't want to see 2011 without NFL football, but I would completely understand if it goes that way. I am not someone who spouts off the tired "billionaires fighting millionaires" line. I would venture to say most players in the NFL aren't millionaires. Just because a particular player's salary states that he is a millionaire doesn't automatically qualify him as one.
The ways things are, I agree that there would not be much dialogue - on either side. But that has been cultivated over generations of players and workers - I am sure that such dialogue was more prevalent 40 years ago, for many reasons. Neither side would really want to talk about labor relations if they had the chance to talk - which is what is especially sad. But, even if there were some players with a propensity to have such ideas (NBA's Etan Thomas comes to mind), it is much more difficult to have those kinds of talks.
Hey Dave, great column.
But I'm curious about where the Green Bay owners stand in all this. I'd assume that the Green Bay owners (all 110,000 of them!) are NOT lining up with the owners of the other teams. I sure as hell hope they're aren't.
Isn't the owners offensive EXACTLY why teams need to be community-owned? Wouldn't it make sense that the NFLPA to begin publicizing the Green Bay model as an alternative to this BS? You gotta ask Smith about that next time you interview him!
to be inherently false to some extent. with the addition of 2 regular season games and reduction of 2 preseason games, there will be more injuries to starters and regulars with less injuries to those fighting to make the 53-man rosters.
I think that you've missed the point, here. Player salaries are NOT the problem--the greed and avarice of the owners is. Health care should be guaranteed for all current and former players for life, and the owners should be forced to "open the books" so the NFLPA and the rest of us can see exactly how much these pigs have been making on the broken bodies of athletes and at the expense of municipalities around the country. Solidarity with the NFLPA is the best medicine.
PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!
Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to dave@edgeofsports.com.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)
Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com
Please consider making a donation to keep this site going.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)