The Ugly Truth: How Diamondbacks Owner Ken Kendrick Continues to Support SB 1070

"If you are upset with Arizona's immigrant laws, please don’t take it out on Major League Baseball! Sports and politics do not mix!" With a near military discipline, this had been the message pushed by much of the sports media in conjunction with the Arizona Republican party. The aim has been to head-off any notion of boycotting the Arizona Diamondbacks or calling for the 2011 All Star game to be removed from their home at Chase Field in Phoenix. Governor Jan Brewer was given a page on [1] to say that boycott campaigns aimed at sports are "inappropriate and misguided." Diamondbacks executive Derrek Hall parroted the governor [2], calling protesters "misguided" because "the organization doesn't take political positions."


Team owner and Republican Party bankroller Ken Kendrick was shaken enough to release a statement saying [3] that he personally "opposes" the bill.


There is one problem with this public relations fusillade: it's based on a fundamental lie. Ken Kendrick is showing through his actions that he not only supports this bill, he is using his position as Diamondback team owner to do it.


On May 20th, the Nation has learned, Ken Kendrick is holding a private fundraiser inside his owners box at Chase Field for SB 1070 supporter State Senator Jonathan Paton. The fundraiser will be taking place during the D-backs game against the San Francisco Giants. Paton is attempting to make the leap from the state house to the US Congress, and he is depending upon the deep pockets of Kendrick to make it happen.


Leave aside for a moment the ethical and perhaps legal ramifications that Ken Kendrick is using a stadium built with $250 million in public dollars to raise money for his pet candidates. The fact is that while Kendrick publicly distances himself from the bill, he is using the home of the supposedly "apolitical" Diamondbacks organization as a fund raising center for SB 1070 supporting politicians. As Paton says on his campaign website [4], "We need to secure the border, and we need to secure it now. That's why I voted for SB 1070, and that's why I urge the governor to sign it."


Jim Nintzel reported in the Tucson Weekly [5], "boasting that he voted for it [SB 1070] before he resigned from the state Senate to [run for congress]…..Paton said that complaints about racial profiling have been overblown."


Paton has also received full-throated support from the author of SB 1070, State Senator Russell Pearce. In an open letter [6], Pearce wrote glowingly of Paton, “I have served with Senator Jonathan Paton for the last five years in the Legislature. During that time he has voted for every single anti-illegal immigration bill I have sponsored...He has done this despite pressure from the open borders crowd...He opposes amnesty or any path to citizenship for those illegally in the United States...I am proud to have worked with him and know him to be a solid patriot. I believe he will make a great Congressman for Southern Arizona, a Congressman we can all be proud of."


Pearce himself has been under national scrutiny recently because of his disturbingly casual connections to white supremacist organizations. As Rachel Maddow highlighted on her show [7], Pearce has been photographed hugging Neo-Nazi leader J.T. Ready. He also received unwanted attention by forwarding online articles written by the Nazi organization the National Alliance.


Jonathan Paton trumpets the support he receives from Russell Pearce. This is who Jonathan Paton is. This is who Ken Kendrick is using his publicly-funded stadium to support.


Favianna Rodriguez, co-founder of, which is a co-founder of the All Star Game boycott campaign, said to me, "Latinos and their allies across the country are targeting Major League Baseball to show that laws like SB 1070 will have dire economic consequences. Mr. Kendrick's continued support of the politicians behind SB 1070 will only further inspire that movement."


There is only one conclusion. The Arizona Diamondbacks should continue to be boycotted and protested until Ken Kendrick stops supporting these politicians and using his publicly funded stadium to do so. The All Star game should be moved, and anyone who says that sports and politics don't mix, should first aim that cliche in the direction of the Arizona Diamondbacks owner's box. Keep the  protests going. Keep calling to have the All Star game moved. Any other strategy would truly be "misguided."


[Dave Zirin is the author of the forthcoming “Bad Sports: How Owners are Ruining the Games we Love” (Scribner) Receive his column every week by emailing Contact him at]

4 Reader Comments | Add a comment

Well said indeed

Seeing as how Governor Brewer couldn't even define the "type" or "look" of the humans this legislation intends to discriminate against, it is clearly she who is "inappropriate and misguided." That much we know. It's a crapshoot. Kendrick's reaction came only after a huge uproar from those of us rational enough to take direct action. He was waiting to see how bad it would get, consulting with his PR gurus, then issuing a carefully worded statement.

I, for one, welcome this kind of action. What did we expect Kendrick to do anyway?

And let those who say sports and politics don't mix cop out all they want to: "I just want to relax and forget about the worries of the big wide world, Dave, that's why I turn on the game. Don't make me think about the effects of my actions unless it fits nicely in between commercials for things-I-don'" I am a big sports fan too, but I don't get distracted by the pretty lights either. No, I insist on understanding what my actions mean in a larger context.

Ask any other sports fan if they care about their tax dollars and I'm sure they'll agree. But only once you've equated the two. Until then they will happily bury their heads in the sand until it turns to glass.

Just asking

I recognize that in professional sports politics play a big role in their daily operation.. DZ has applauded the Phoenix Suns for wearing Los Suns and taking a stand against SB 1070. The question I'd ask: Should this support extend to college level and lower? Should colleges/high schools in Arizona and across the country take votes to have their teams display support yea/nay for various political and social issues? If not why not? Could or should various youth leagues be also involved?

The wearing of political messages is banned by various sporting organizations so seek democratic referendums to overturn them. If political and social messages were made legal would different players on the same team wear different and opposing messages? Would baseball arguments turn into political debates?

Bigoted, Bullying, F**ks

I have had it with people who believe in might makes right. If you are not immortal, You are not mightier or more privileged than anyone else.

The only people who give murdering, thieving, lying Whores like Jan Brewer respect are murdering, thieving lying motherf**kers like obama, bush, cheney, rove

The Social Compact f**ks its mother and all who support it f**k their mother.



Curious last sentence. (Style and substance.) Are you referring to the Social Compact, the organization that demolishes inner city neighborhoods, etc., or The Social Contract, which is the theory that tries to explain ways in which people form states to maintain what they call "social order"?

4 Reader Comments | Add a comment

PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!

Submit your comment below:

Your Name


(Only if we need to contact you—not for advertising purposes)



Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)

Contact him at