In the days following the passage of the racist
Padres first baseman Adrian Gonzalez who holds dual citizenship in the
Venezuelan-born
Their teammate Scott Hairston said, "I'm half-Mexican I definitely disagree with it, can't really see anything positive about it, and I just hope it doesn't lead to a lot of chaos. It just wasn't necessary to pass a bill like that.
White sox manager Ozzie Guillen, also Venezuelan, said he would boycott the 2011 All Star game "as a Latin American" if it went ahead in
But the biggest news is that the union, the Major League Baseball Players Association, is now speaking out. Executive director Michael Weiner issued the below statement:
"The recent passage by
"The impact of the bill signed into law in
Anyone who straps on the snark and dismisses either the above statements or the protests outside the park, are oblivious to the way sports have historically been an electric political platform for social justice. The actions of athletes can humanize an issue and reach untold numbers who skip the front page and go directly to sports. There are rare historical moments when protest can shape athletes and athletes can in turn shape the confidence, size, and scope of protest. This could very well be one of those moments.
1) Thoughts on Kendrick's press release and interviews suggesting he did not/does not support the bill & why more people are not discussing this
2) Thoughts on the under-coverage of the amendments to the bill
3)People have suggested that this law does nothing more than enforce current Federal Laws. Is this true? If so, how does this change the complexion of the uproar? If this is true, then shouldn't attention be put on the Federal Govt.?
I'm curious why Torrealba thinks Venezuela is a 'crazy country'?
Is that because it has expropriated the wealth of the nation's oligarchy and injected it into social programs that benefit the working poor?
I suppose radical politics go only so far when you make millions.
The Arizona law will likely be found unconstitutional under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. It's a terrible law, suitable for a police state.
However, you Demagogue Dave Zirin are a laughably hypocritical voice on this topic. You have no credibility to stand up for civil liberties.
You hypocritically censor Tim Tebow's right to free speech on abortion, yet you scream free speech when the Cubs censor free speech.
You take on the mantle of due process now, but you demogogically called the innocent Duke students (and now Roethlisberger) rapists based solely on initial police reports.
Voltaire said: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
However, you clearly subscribe to another Communist's views: "Power grows out of the barrel of a gun." -- Chairman Mao.
That's the funny thing about civil liberties Dave-- either everyone gets them, or no one is safe.
You simply have no credibility on civil liberties Demagogue Dave Zirin.
Tornado:
Have you a standard message which easily is sent via "redial"?
By using the logic of those who cry racism when criticizing this Arizona law, it could be concluded that ANY form of Immigration enforcement is racist by nature. Is that right? When the Feds raid an employer at a food processing factory that employs 90% Latinos, is that racist? Considering the estimated millions of illegal immigrants from Latin America living and working in America, an overwhelming majority of all total illegal immigrants in our country, it can always be condemned as racial profiling for ANY form of enforcement.
Now this particular law in Arizona may or may not be an effective enforcement policy. But something has to be done. Illegals are burdening our already diminishing availability of social services, their effect on the labor market is disastrous from the perspective of working-class Americans.
We heard the same accusations of racism a few years ago when immigration reform was being considered in DC. This criticism from the media and talking heads is very monolithic, in stark contrast to US public opinion. 70% of Americans support this Arizona law, and a similar number favor strict enforcement of our immigration laws. But we get shouted down as ignorant, back-water, racist rednecks from the likes who never have to compete with an illegal immigrant for a job, nor seek assistance from the state for social services.
The collective effort to curtail any meaningful enforcement of immigration laws is anti-democratic elitism.
William: Majority support for this law is hardly relevant to the question of whether it is morally just, or even constitutional. Even if it is true that, unfortunately, a majority of Americans approve of this bill, then it doesn't change the fact that peoples' civil rights are inevitably going to be violated as a result of the bill. You can always find a supposedly "democratic" majority to support anything if you phrase the question right. We all know majorities have often supported racial oppression and injustices whether ethnic or political. This law has nothing to do with "enforcement of immigration laws"; it's nothing less than racial profiling to stop anyone who "looks" illegal. I think anyone should be able to get that, and when a majority of Americans realize that, I know that they will not be supporting this bill.
PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!
Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to dave@edgeofsports.com.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)
Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com
Please consider making a donation to keep this site going.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)