Competition becomes riveting when opponents complement each other’s strengths and flaws. Two imperfect adversaries can match up and forge something memorable. Ali vs. Frazier. Magic vs. Bird. Navratilova vs. Evert. Tom vs. Jerry. This past week we witnessed a set of battles –in politics and sports – that eerily mirrored one another. In one corner we have Kobe Bryant and Dick Cheney. In the other there is Carmelo Anthony and Barack Obama.
Bryant and Anthony, leaders of their respective basketball teams - the Los Angeles Lakers and the Denver Nuggets - have been locked in a playoff series that has the makings of a classic. The series is tied at two games apiece. Through the first two games alone, the cumulative score was 209-208. Bryant scored 72 points in the series and the man they call “Melo” countered with 73. Last Thursday’s heart-thumping game went down to the last play.
Cheney and Obama had their own Thursday battle, delivering back-to-back speeches on national security, torture, and the closing of the prison on Cuba’s Guantánamo Bay. As Cheney sneered at the world and Obama spoke softly, his eyelids at half-mast, the parallels with their hoops brethren were overpowering.
In one corner, Cheney and his long lost twin Kobe Bryant. In the other, Obama and his brother from another mother, Carmelo Anthony.
The facts speak for themselves:
Cheney and Kobe both live to scowl and a sneer. Their opponents, Obama and Carmelo, have trademark smiles that would shame sunshine, inspiring media and colleagues alike to gush.
Cheney and Kobe give off vibes like they have lived through authentically tough times. Cheney speaks with the rumbling gravity of a scared Marine Corps vet while Kobe tries to come across like he is a hard case with a short fuse. In reality, Cheney avoided Nam because, as he said infamously, he had “better things to do;” Kobe was raised in Europe by his basketball playing father, becoming fluent in Italian in the process. In contrast, in his youth, Obama and his family relied on food stamps for a time; ‘Melo was raised on the roughest edges of Baltimore. But both are also known for their “mellow” manner, playing it cool, attracting a crowd and making people feel at ease. Cheney and Kobe are more known for making people feel like they were just wedgied. They aren’t there to be your buddy, but to get you to perform though your own discomfort.
There are other similarities as well. Kobe conserves his energy these days, shooting long jumpers and then - before you know it - exploding to the rim and sucking the oxygen out of an arena. Cheney has been largely silent for years, and on a good day had a pulse. But the man known as vice has emerged in recent weeks to control the news cycle by staunchly defending the legality and morality of torture. By contrast, Carmelo plays the whole game at the same pace. He doesn’t explode to the rim. He glides. He would sooner attend a go-go show than overextend himself. What can sometimes be mistaken for lackadaisical play is really Melo just being mellow and lulling opponents into a false sense of security before he takes them to the rack. Obama, for all his oratorical gifts, will more often happily drone on until opponents don’t know how to respond.
We saw this clearly on Thursday. Cheney came out acerbic and brazen but seemed to lose steam as his own 5,500-word speech meandered on. Kobe as well came out strong but didn’t shoot a free throw in the fourth quarter and couldn’t even get the ball on the last play. He looked spent. Also on Thursday, Obama spoke softly and without urgency. But he ended by giving a 6,000-word speech that carefully constructed his every angle. In it he maddened many supporters who long for him to start breathing some fire and find Cheney some handcuffs. Melo as well came out soft in the first quarter, maddening fans with his absence of urgency. He is also a player who has made it difficult for longtime Denver supporters by appearing disinterested in “the fight.” This is the first year in his six-year career Anthony’s team has made it out of the first round of the playoffs.
In the weeks to come we will no doubt get more drama from Cheney, Bryant, Obama and Anthony. One debate has life or death implications, the other only feels that way. One is a metaphor for life, the other is life itself. The sports contest is exemplary. But on the political side, one thing is certain. We need to be able to blaze a more urgent progressive path so our choices are not confined to being a passive Melo or a mega Dick.
Ouch!!! Damn, Dave I know you're all about bringing to light that place where sports and politics collide and I love your work, but this collision hurt! Now, I am a Kobe fan so let me be upfront with you on that. But, I'm starting to like Mello more and more as the series continues on. They are different personalities and players with different skills, no doubt. But to drop the DC (Dick Cheney) bomb on Kobe, and to annoint Mello with Obama status, I don't know, man I think that goes a little too far on both ends. The comparison may be closer to Rahm Emanuel (Kobe) vs. Joe Biden (Mello) - Here's what I'm thinking- RM- a reputation for getting in folks faces when he needs to, but also getting the job done; JB- a reputation of being hard working, smiles alot, but also getting the job done. They're both good guys, certainly with flaws but still on the side of good. Again, I may be a little touchy 'cause I am a Kobe and Lakers fan, but Dick Cheney? C'mon, man that's harsh.
I thought EOS was supposed to be progressive! The dominant haterist discourse about Hoops stars--including but not limited to Kobe--is largely rooted in white chauvanism. Both stars have performed like brilliant artists in these playoffs. Cheney has never done anything as well as Kobe plays Hoops. C'mon, if this was correct Sasha would have been shot in the face by now.
I have to agree with most here.
EOS is one of my favorite places on the net, no doubt.
But this one went too far. I'm not a Kobe fan, but he doesn't deserve the comparison to a man who is supporting torture. Mello has a mean streak, too. Just check out what happened when Ashton Kutcher got a hold of him on Punk'd. This was a bit of a stretch.
Dave, usually your column is enlightening, but this column makes no sense, and seems like it is based on a half baked idea. Why not, say, compare Dwight Howard to the Russian army, and the Cavs to the US trained forces of Georgia? Exactly, there is no interesting comparison. What are you trying to say here... that you have found some problems with media's coverage of the NBA finals, and you are connecting it to US media coverage of political leaders? It's a stretch, and a poor one at that.
I'd like to agree with most of the folks on here especially with the commie laker fan in regards to the correlation between white chauvinism and the coverage of athletes of color.
Kobe is still a black man. No matter where he grew up and what his upbringing was (whether relatively privileged or not) and that was evident in the coverage of him and his court case. (i'm not saying that that womyn involved in the case was treated fairly either b/c she wasn't and that is another extension of the patriarchal society we live in and often times reinforce on the daily. )
With that said, i still want to thank you for this piece and having the courage to put it up. This is your space to express what you feel and if this is your view there is nothing wrong with you expressing it.
I just hope that you take our positions on the situation and reflect on your argument (or at least what we seem to understand your argument is).
Dwight Howard is Superman, not only because of that moniker, but because he is so strong he tears down shot clocks with his strength, he has a positive attitude, his nemesis is the midget Mr. Mxyzptlk (Van Gundy), and his kryptonite is his free throw shooting.
LeBron, of course, is Batman, with his so-called All Star sidekick Robin (Mo), and who also keeps his valuable sidekicks close like the cunning Lucious Fox (Coach Brown) , the earnest Commish Gordon (Delonte) and his long-serving Alfred Pennyworth (the antiquated Big Z).
You see, I can smoke a joint and write a ridiculous Leftist column too! Too bad I only met Chuck D at a couple PE shows or I could also run a popular website where other fair-minded posters almost-uniformly call out my retarded column. Sigh.
I enjoyed the article and I think many of the critics are missing the point or taking it a bit too seriously. As much as we all hate Cheney (the man is an ass, and should be in jail, and I would prefer to just ignore him at this point and relegate him to irrelevance), DZ is not comparing politics, he is comparing styles. It's not Cheney the reactionary conservative that he likens Kobe to, but the Cheney character type who is successful and feared because of his ruthless, cuthroat, uncompromising approach to his craft. Is this really so off-base?
Maybe the comparisons are a stretch, but it's a fun exercise and is a nice way of a) showing that similar forms of interaction and confrontation occur in sport and "real world", and b) taking some jabs at Cheney while urging Obama to feel some urgency in promoting a more progressive agenda. There are many ways to link sport and politics and one is using sport as a framework for political statement. I don't think this is usually the approach Dave takes to his articles, but it's a nice change of pace.
PS - It's nice to see Melo get some well-deserved praise for his game. He is usually left out in discussions of the very top tier of NBAers, where he surely belongs.
But I made a comparison too of Dwight and LeBron to superhero characters and it doesn't make it less inane.
Yes, Kobe has not been the most accommodating teammate, similar to Cheney trashing Dems every chance he gets. Yes, Melo exhibits more playfulness on the court, similar to Obama's jocularity (although don't tell that to disabled bowlers). Big f-in deal.
At least amoral Jordan said "Republicans Buy Sneakers, Too" -- adding some actual context for a baseline comparison. Not that being amoral is a bad thing, per se; not everybody has to maximize their celebrity with social activism. Kobe and Melo sure don't.
All of us posting here follow sports (or at least our NBA), and we can smell a stretch when we see one. I think we all know Zirin can do (much) better, like his New Orleans piece. This was hopefully just a hasty one-off that would have gotten an ""F" in journalism school for making sweeping assumptions more befitting of a primary school essay.
I find it interesting that more people seem moved by Dave's perspective on Kobe than by his comments about the President! Wow, does Kobe have that much juice? I guess so amongst sports fans.
I'm pretty dispassionate about all these guys. I see the comparison of Kobe to Cheney, they're both prickly asses. I don't know much about Melo, but the President has always tried so hard not to be perceived as the "angry black man", that he comes across as neither angry, black, or a man. I agree with Dave, he needs to be more direct and just tell Cheney to stop being a "Dick". But then neither Dave nor I have ever earned a single vote, so who are we to tell the President how to conduct his business. It pains me to admit it but I, like Dave, am still waiting and hoping for our progressive President to emerge.
The comments here are truly fascinating. It's meant to be tongue in cheek. I don't think Kobe is a war criminal. I do however believe that Obama could stand to be far less "mellow" when it comes to fitting Cheney and friends with orange jumpsuits.
If this was meant as tongue in cheek, it seems like it got lost in translation (as has been known to happen on the internet). The seriousness with which many of the topics on this site are dealt may be responsible.
Some of the comments on here are a bit over the top. Wasn't my favorite piece, but crazy leftist jive? I think not...
If you're familiar with the column, I think you get it. I thought it was creative. Maybe it required a bit of imagination on the part of the reader, but that's probably on purpose. I mean, if you reined in on the creativity for fear of being misunderstood, then you'd lose that Edge. Then you'd have to change the name of the column.
You're right, Kobe's not a war criminal...just a guy who walked on a rape charge thanks to being a millionaire. He's only destroyed one life, not millions, so while the comparison probably isn't totally accurate (nor is DZ claiming they're exactly alike) it's not like Kobe's only being criticized because of the faces he makes or being less than our favorite basketball player.
One other thing...I'm sick to bloody death of the right wing attack that ANYONE thinks Obama is the "Messiah." Not only does NOBODY think Obama is the "Messiah" contrary to Rush Limbaugh attacks liberals don't even like Obama that much. He's better than most of the DNC centrists the Democratic Party has given us over the last 20 years, and of course massively better than W or McCain, but he's not that beloved, much less "worshipped" by people on the left or anyone else. Right wing hate radio made up the lie that we think Obama is the "Messiah," compounded with the far more idiotic (and destructive) lie that the mainstream media is in agreement with the left on this...or anything else.
hk4Dek I am always excited to visit this blog in the evenings.Please churning hold the contents. It is very entertaining.
PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!
Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to dave@edgeofsports.com.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)
Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com
Please consider making a donation to keep this site going.
Become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)