Why We Need A People's History of Sports

There are those who insist that sports and politics don’t belong in the same sentence, the same zip code, or the same universe.

They mouth platitudes about how these two worlds must be hermetically sealed from one another, lest the dirty world of politics infect the sanctity of the playing field. Before the 2008 Olympics, International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge said that "political factors" must be kept away from Beijing.

USA basketball Mike Krzyzewski chimed in, "None of these athletes (has) a responsibility to be political. They have the responsibility to represent their country." The chief of the Canadian Olympic Committee, Dick Pound, also thundered to the Canada’s Olympians, "If it is so tough for you that you can't bear not to say anything, then stay at home."

This is rank stupidity and stunning hypocricy. It’s a lie. People can say all they want that sports and politics have nothing to do with one another, but as the saying goes, “you don’t have to believe in gravity to fall out of an airplane.”

So much discussion of sports, both its past and present, is about sanding off, beautifying, or simply obliterating anything that might be seen as political.

Here is how sports history usually goes:

You have a hero - usually acting like the love child of John Wayne and Sarah Palin - with obstacles in their path. But all those obstacles are overcome with a good dose of true grit.

Whehter the autobiography of Cal Ripken or Dennis Rodman, one problem with sports history: it is hyper individualistic and completely absent of context. In other words it’s told a lot like history.

The other problem with sports history is that much of it is based on lies.

Once again, this is a lot like history. You could call it “Lies my Gym Teacher Told Me.”

Let’s take baseball. The Baseball Hall of Fame is located in beautiful All-American Cooperstown New York. Why? Because that’s where they tell us the game was invented by Army General Abner Doubleday.

There are some problems with this however. Three in fact.

The first is that the game wasn’t invented in Cooperstown.

The second is that Abner Doubleday never set foot in Cooperstown.

The third is the tiny fact that Abner Doubleday didn’t invent baseball.

In fact the good general didn’t know a baseball from an iPhone.

This Doubleday myth was created in 1895 by millionaire baseball owner Albert Spalding of Spalding sporting goods.

Spalding chose Cooperstown as the game’s birthplace because of its small town postcard beauty, which seemed like a better fit than the actual birthplace of baseball, Hoboken, New Jersey.

And why did Spalding tell us that General Doubleday as the game’s inventor? It played to the man’s political goals: to merge baseball with the All American virtues of patriotism and war.

As Albert Spalding announced his discovery that Doubleday was the great creator, he said:

Baseball, I repeat, is war! And the playing of the game is a battle in which every contestant is a commanding general, wh ohaving gained an advantage, must hold it by every resource of his mind and muscle.

Because of people like Albert Spalding, we don’t have a people’s history of sports. We have instead a bosses’ history of sports based on bluster and lies.

The real story of how the beauty of play developed into a trillion dollar business can only be understood by looking at the profound economic changes that took place as this country transitioned from a farming society, to the military and economic colossus it is today.

When this country was discovered, or conquered as the case may be, sports were considered a sin, the devil’s work, and blasphemy against God and Church. Then as the country developed and sports became something to both sell to people as entertainment, and socialize working class immigrants to see America as the greatest country on earth. But the 20th century saw numerous examples, public and private, where sports exploded in growth but also became a platform for spectacular dissent.

I wrote A People’s History of Sports in the United States to reclaim a sports history that is far more dynamic than we were ever led to believe. I wrote it because as Howard Zinn’s People’s History of the United States, taught so many of us, we learn about history not only to understand the past, but lay claim to the future. And if we can reclaim sports, if we can crash down the palace gates of play, there’s no telling what we can go after next.

9 Reader Comments | Add a comment

Yep, but what about the left?

Congrats on the book--I'm excited about it, and this post is one I'll be forwarding along to the folks I know. But what I'd like to see is a similar articulation not of why sports beg political analysis, but why politics needs also to take into account sports. In my universe, full of queers and lefties and anarchists, the relevance of sports to politics is the harder link to make. (This may have been amply covered elsewhere.)

Relevance of sports to politics

Emily:--Whe the 2008 summer Beijing Olympics attract the largest global TV audience ever with an estimated 4.7 billion viewers or 70% of the world's population, when Obama delivers his acceptance speech at Invesco Stadium, when, ironically enough, the populace of New Orleans, homeless after Katrina, who can't afford a ticket to the domed statium for an NFL game, get free admission while they wait for the government to extend a helping hand, one might see a certain relevance.

The Mills Commission

Hi, Dave. I'm thrilled to see the book is now out--can't wait to use it in class.

Just a clarification on Doubleday. The myth owes itself to the Mills Commission, which was organized by Spalding in 1905. He had been in a debate with sportswriter Henry Chadwick about whether baseball was American or British in origin. Spalding wanted to prove the virtues of the young nation. So the patriotism of the myth was a product of an emergent need in the U.S. about crafting an identity that was as much about being "not British" as it was about being "American." Once A.G. Mills delivered the good news to Spalding--that "Baseball had its origins in the United States"--the myth was easily crafted from there.

Origin of baseball

Baseball is apparently British, according to a recently unearthed diary entry (http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=456882), not Hobokenian.

Zeus at Play

The Olympic games in honor of Zeus

1972 Munich the killings for sport
1976 Africans said no way (racist)
1980 Afghanistan: Here they come: Russians!
1984 USSR returns the favor with thanks
Go Zeus, my Lord
Politics and gold (sports)
With honor I earn (play)

-DG

Emily raises a good question

Emily raises a good point about the facility with which politics can be read into sports, and the difficulty of examining the impact of sport on politics.

I haven't read the book as of yet, but can only imagine that Dave touches on both.

To me, however, there is no doubt that sports impacts politics in various, though probably subtle, ways. To begin with, sports have dramatic influences on the social construction of gender, which in turn affects politics in numerous ways (voting patterns, priorities etc.).

I'd think that sports affects politics in the same way that Prime Time television or pop music does --> by being a pat of the cultural fabric of this society it impacts its politics.

Some of the ways sports directly impacts politics, off the top of my head...
- funding and money allocation

- the branding of cities, regions, and countries... think Beijing

- sports are likely to affect interest in politics

- sports reproduces certain hegemonic values and in doing so reinforces corresponding political perspective

- sports fuel nationalism (almost more than anything else), which is nothing if not political

- sports create jobs and industries that are significant to the political-economic structure of society

- sports are important in creating a sense of community that politics rely on

- there are more ways i'm sure

Congrats !

Hi Dave,

I am very excited about the book! I can't wait to read it. Congrats!
It has been longtime! I think the last time we talked was the time we interviewed William Blum author of the “Rogue State” in 2001 in D.C. (part of our ISO activities). Since I lived in Atlanta and now in Baltimore.

Again congrats !

Djibril

people's stories

Thanks for doing the work and having the passion to keep going. In light of the Josh Howard-bashing that is currently going on, it is obvious that when sports figures say political things, many Americans react with vitriolic intensity. People are not being encouraged or educated on how to understand that everyone having an opinion is what makes America great. The recent comments on community-organizing from the right reiterate the ignorance that is perpetuated daily.

Is Sports Activism Dead?

An insightful review of A People's History of Sports in the United States:

http://campusprogress.org/books/3250/is-sports-activism-dead

9 Reader Comments | Add a comment

PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!

Submit your comment below:

Your Name

Email

(Only if we need to contact you—not for advertising purposes)

Subject

Message

Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to dave@edgeofsports.com.


Please become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)


Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com